There have been quite a bit of talk and quite a few articles debating whether or not the Giants of the last few years are a dynasty. Some have said that 3 titles in 5 years is enough to make a team a dynasty while others have argued that since none of them are consecutive and the Giants missed the playoffs in the in between years they cannot be considered a dynasty. Apparently those at Panini/Donruss have made a declaration:
You may be surprised and my thoughts on the dynasty question. At this point the Giants are clearly the team of the 2010s but I would not go so far as to call them a dynasty. The down years in between (although one could argue that without a gruesome leg injury to the guy pictured above the 2011 result may have been different) really make it difficult for me to claim Giants dominance over the last 5 years. If they can pick up a 4th either this year or next I will have a much different answer.
Do you consider the recent Giants a dynasty?